Ember.js vs Vue.js: Which Javascript Framework Breaks the Jinx?

Every once in a while, a new technology, an old problem and a big idea turn into an innovation. Vue.js turns out a winner as it has a comparatively steep learning curve as compared to other frameworks. It is a progressive JavaScript Framework that adds interactivity to the website. Adding a view to a single ‘div’, Vue.js takes some ideas from all modern JS frameworks. It comes with some optional tools to build user-interfaces and thus solves the hard problems of single-page apps incrementally. This is a strand in the narrative that one technology builds about oneself.

• See Also: Svelte vs Vue
• See Also: ReactJS vs VueJS
• See Also: Vue.js vs. AngularJS
• See Also: Vue vs. React
• See Also: Tapping into Vue UI Frameworks
• See Also: Creating Progressive Web Apps with Vue and Ionic

Reasons to Select a JavaScript Framework

The most important reasons for which people select a particular JavaScript Framework or when they are looking for the best client-side JavaScript MV* frameworks:

• Transparency and explicitness of the code
• A framework that can give more power with less code
• A framework that provides a structure to work on, rather than how the work will actually be done
• Does the framework support inbuilt function for routing or does it support routing as an add-on?
• Does the application transfer enough data on a full page load that makes it a single-page app and which could bring significant benefits to the application?
• In case the developer decides to make use of single-page architecture, do the users require the ability to share the links to sub-screens within the interface? If this is so, then the framework must be able to route based on the URL.
• Does the framework provide any special templating technology or as a free choice? A stricter templating option enables more interesting features like 2-way data binding and other custom components
• Does the framework conflict with any of the 3^rd party libraries?
• In case the AMD module loader like Require.JS is being used, it is to be checked if the framework is compatible with it?
• How easy is it to test the code that is produced within the framework?
• Does the framework provide an HTTP client service for basic AJAX calls?
• Is the attached documentation complete and up to date?
• All MV* frameworks are forward-looking and thus compatibility with the latest browser version is essential prerequisite to work

What is Vue.js?

With clearest official documentation, the smallest codebase, integrates well with Bootstrap and learning that it was backed by strong projects like Laravel and a big company like Alibaba,  getting started with Vue.JS is easier and helpful in enhancing legacy applications with no build process whatsoever:

• Vue Components: Templating with HTML and pug is easy, scripting with Babel, TypeScript, CoffeeScript, and styling with SASS, LESS, Stylus.
• It can be used to add modularized and asynchronous state management with ease.
• It comes with its dev tools extension that helps you travel back in time and check all the previous states in addition to inspecting your components.
• JS prototypes entire applications with Vue-CLI and prototype individual components.
• It helps route well.
• It assists in adding animations, transitions and isolated styles to the components.
• It implements code splitting and server-side rendering for better initial load performance. As the views are rendered directly to the server, it can be easily indexed by search engines.
• It can be used with any front-end stack.
• It is lightweight.
• It is a single-file component.
• It supports inline templating and JSX.
• Vue implements streaming server-side rendering.
• It can be made even lighter. Templates can be compiled and minified to 12 KB.

What is Ember.js?

Ember.js on the other hand is still an immensely competent framework and almost anything can be achieved with it. Ember.js helps build the products instead of constantly configuring the stuff. Fast forward to today though Ember-CLI has 95k weekly downloads, up from 75k a year ago. Sounds good? Hold in place – Vue has 330k weekly downloads!

It can be discerned that Ember’s magic has dimmed, big time, compared to its other JS framework counterparts. Let’s formalize our curiosity by sneaking at the comparison below:

Ember vs. Vue

Synopsis

One needs to decide what they really want to do – whether they want to create a single page application or just an application? Is it just a presentation layer that is required or a complete structure of the view, models, and controllers? Comparing Ember vs. Vue, if an app is required then a framework like Ember.js is suitable. Another way round, if a website is required, Vue.js is preferable.

After working with React.js for 5 years and with Angular.js for 8 years, Vue.js comes as a fresh respite that actuates things swiftly. Knowing JavaScript is undoubtedly a huge advantage but the Vue framework itself has some lucrative features to show things faster on screen.

See also: AngularJS vs NodeJS vs ReactJS: Which One Would You Choose?

Vue.js is a fast and responsive framework for designing the website front-end. It is lightweight, clean, data-driven and reactive front-end ViewModel can assist in swift development. Vue.JS takes the center-stage as it provides minimal functionality. But of course, they provide officially well-maintained tools and docs.

In this way, there are lots of things to think about and this is in no way a comprehensive list. There is a requirement to know more depending upon the constraints upon which a vuejs developer works and considers other qualities such as download size or rendering performance. But we hope that this list serves as a decent introduction to the basic issues worth thinking about. We take responsibility to set benchmarks, develop expertise in today’s transformational technologies and learn how the web application development technologies can specifically help your organization grow. Need help? Drop us a query and our team will reply as soon as they can!